<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Nanosocialism - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/index.php?title=Nanosocialism&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.4</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 12:14:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Ecb:&amp;#32;Created page with 'Category:Memes Nanosocialism is a political philosophy, first stated (under the name “information socialism”) by the Australian academic Kyle Porters in 2034. Porters…'</title>
			<link>http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/index.php?title=Nanosocialism&amp;diff=9056&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;&lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/Category:Memes&quot; title=&quot;Category:Memes&quot;&gt;Category:Memes&lt;/a&gt; Nanosocialism is a political philosophy, first stated (under the name “information socialism”) by the &lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/Australia&quot; title=&quot;Australia&quot;&gt;Australian&lt;/a&gt; academic Kyle Porters in 2034. Porters…&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Memes]]&lt;br /&gt;
Nanosocialism is a political philosophy, first stated&lt;br /&gt;
(under the name “information socialism”) by the [[Australia]]n&lt;br /&gt;
academic Kyle Porters in 2034. Porters observed that&lt;br /&gt;
although modern civilization was utterly dependent on information&lt;br /&gt;
technologies, the central notion of intellectual property&lt;br /&gt;
often gave rise to significant injustice. Although he was by&lt;br /&gt;
no means the first person to point out this contradiction, he&lt;br /&gt;
was the first philosopher to construct a coherent political ideology&lt;br /&gt;
in response.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Porters pointed out that the individual holders of intellectual&lt;br /&gt;
property were usually unable to enforce their rights&lt;br /&gt;
against piracy. Software and genetic designs were being stolen&lt;br /&gt;
wholesale around the world, bringing profit to pirates at the&lt;br /&gt;
expense of the original designers. Despite this, the artificial&lt;br /&gt;
scarcity imposed on information by the concept of intellectual&lt;br /&gt;
property kept the benefits of new technology out of the hands&lt;br /&gt;
of most of the world’s billions, who lived in rank poverty as a&lt;br /&gt;
result. Porters suggested that the state should go beyond the&lt;br /&gt;
simple enforcement of copyrights and patents, and actually&lt;br /&gt;
seize ownership of them. He believed that only the state could&lt;br /&gt;
properly reward technological innovation, while still distributing&lt;br /&gt;
the benefits of such innovation fairly to all.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At first, “infosocialism” was not taken seriously in the&lt;br /&gt;
developed nations, but in some parts of the world it combined&lt;br /&gt;
with the [[Majority Cultures]] movement to produce a viable&lt;br /&gt;
new ideology. By the late 2060s, several nations in South&lt;br /&gt;
America and Southeast Asia were governed by local infosocialist&lt;br /&gt;
parties. Piracy of advanced technology had long been&lt;br /&gt;
a going concern in these nations, primarily benefitting a corrupt&lt;br /&gt;
entrepreneurial class. Bolstered by Porters’ theories,&lt;br /&gt;
governments found it attractive to seize the benefits of such&lt;br /&gt;
piracy for themselves, striking a blow against Western-style&lt;br /&gt;
capitalism and local corruption at the same time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The infosocialist nations repudiated all international&lt;br /&gt;
treaties protecting intellectual property. Patents and copyrights&lt;br /&gt;
held elsewhere were ruthlessly pirated, although the&lt;br /&gt;
infosocialist regimes usually offered “royalty” payments if&lt;br /&gt;
the owners of intellectual property were willing to sign over&lt;br /&gt;
their rights. Scientists and engineers within the infosocialist&lt;br /&gt;
nations were often richly rewarded by the state for their&lt;br /&gt;
work, at the cost of losing all control over their inventions.&lt;br /&gt;
Some of the infosocialist nations even extended the principle&lt;br /&gt;
to works of creative art, seizing the right to publish such&lt;br /&gt;
works and pay royalties to their creators.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Naturally, the repudiation of international agreements&lt;br /&gt;
had severe consequences, as most nations imposed economic&lt;br /&gt;
sanctions on the infosocialist regimes. In response, the&lt;br /&gt;
most committed nations in the infosocialist bloc formed the&lt;br /&gt;
[[:Category:Transpacific Socialist Alliance|Transpacific Socialist Alliance]]. At about this time, the outside&lt;br /&gt;
media began calling the new ideology “nanosocialism,”&lt;br /&gt;
due to the Alliance’s emphasis on state control of emergent&lt;br /&gt;
nanotechnologies.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The TSA has struggled along ever since, surviving economic&lt;br /&gt;
sanctions and the [[Pacific War]], gathering&lt;br /&gt;
more support around the world each year. Most outside&lt;br /&gt;
observers believe that nanosocialism is doomed to fail, for&lt;br /&gt;
many of the same reasons that Soviet-style Communism&lt;br /&gt;
failed a century ago. Still, in many parts of the world the ideology&lt;br /&gt;
is strongly attractive, and the TSA shows no signs of&lt;br /&gt;
immediate collapse.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:34:45 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Ecb</dc:creator>			<comments>http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/index.php/Talk:Nanosocialism</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>