<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Cyberdemocracy - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/index.php?title=Cyberdemocracy&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.4</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 12:13:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>Ecb:&amp;#32;Created page with 'Category:Memes Since the early 20th century, most representative democracies have seen the rise of mass media as a tool of politics. Politicians advertise themselves to the e…'</title>
			<link>http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/index.php?title=Cyberdemocracy&amp;diff=9058&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;#39;&lt;a href=&quot;/index.php/Category:Memes&quot; title=&quot;Category:Memes&quot;&gt;Category:Memes&lt;/a&gt; Since the early 20th century, most representative democracies have seen the rise of mass media as a tool of politics. Politicians advertise themselves to the e…&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;[[Category:Memes]]&lt;br /&gt;
Since the early 20th century, most representative democracies&lt;br /&gt;
have seen the rise of mass media as a tool of politics.&lt;br /&gt;
Politicians advertise themselves to the electorate. Access to&lt;br /&gt;
the media costs money, usually far more than an individual&lt;br /&gt;
politician can supply for himself. The result has been the rise&lt;br /&gt;
of a class of professional politicians, beholden to the wealthy&lt;br /&gt;
interests which donate money to election campaigns.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Further, even the best (and most honest) professional&lt;br /&gt;
politicians are only human. The sheer complexity of modern&lt;br /&gt;
society means that few laws are without unintended consequences,&lt;br /&gt;
some of them drastic.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to these problems has become&lt;br /&gt;
increasingly popular: cyberdemocracy. Cyberdemocracy&lt;br /&gt;
incorporates certain political forms that have until now been&lt;br /&gt;
used only by small communities. It draws most of its inspiration&lt;br /&gt;
from the political constitution of ancient Athens and&lt;br /&gt;
the structure of New England “town-meeting” democracy. In&lt;br /&gt;
order to make these institutions work at the nation-state level,&lt;br /&gt;
cyberdemocracy makes intensive use of AI.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a great deal of diversity in cyberdemocratic systems,&lt;br /&gt;
but most of them share a few common features.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Selection of Officials==&lt;br /&gt;
Under a cyberdemocratic system, some political offices&lt;br /&gt;
are no longer filled by direct popular vote. Instead, citizens&lt;br /&gt;
are chosen to fill each office at random from a list of eligible&lt;br /&gt;
candidates. Eligibility may be limited to citizens who have&lt;br /&gt;
reached a certain age, who can pass minimal education&lt;br /&gt;
requirements, who have not been convicted of any crimes, or&lt;br /&gt;
who fit other reasonable criteria. The selected citizen holds&lt;br /&gt;
office for a fixed term, after which he returns to private life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Office-holders selected by lot are almost always political&lt;br /&gt;
novices. To fill this gap, each official may select a human&lt;br /&gt;
staff and a set of advanced AI to advise him. This support&lt;br /&gt;
team collects information, provides legal counsel, helps to&lt;br /&gt;
draft legislation, and so on. The AI team member is particularly&lt;br /&gt;
important, designed to avoid bias and give clear, thorough&lt;br /&gt;
advice. Of course, even with cybernetic support some&lt;br /&gt;
“amateur politicians” fail as wise and effective officials. For&lt;br /&gt;
this reason, selection by lot is usually applied only to large&lt;br /&gt;
councils, such as regional or national legislatures. In such&lt;br /&gt;
large groups, individuals who are incompetent or politically&lt;br /&gt;
extreme will tend to be checked by their colleagues.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One variation on this system is to select candidates for&lt;br /&gt;
office at random. For example, if a legislative seat is open, a&lt;br /&gt;
fixed number of candidates are selected by lot from among&lt;br /&gt;
the eligible citizens. Each candidate is given AI and human&lt;br /&gt;
staff support in order to run his campaign, and an equal&lt;br /&gt;
amount of funding to spend on the media. Campaigns are&lt;br /&gt;
usually quite short, lasting no more than a few weeks. At the&lt;br /&gt;
end of this time, the citizens select their legislator through&lt;br /&gt;
direct popular vote in the traditional fashion. This system&lt;br /&gt;
does not prevent the intrusion of money into politics –&lt;br /&gt;
moneyed interests can still use their own funding to influence&lt;br /&gt;
the vote. Still, it minimizes the effect of machine politics and&lt;br /&gt;
preserves the role of citizen voting in the selection process.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Lawmaking==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selection of public officials partially or completely by&lt;br /&gt;
lot is the most distinctive (and controversial) aspect of&lt;br /&gt;
cyberdemocracy. More fundamental to the system is the&lt;br /&gt;
mechanism by which law is made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Most cyberdemocratic systems require the citizens as a&lt;br /&gt;
whole to take on the bulk of law-making duties. All citizens&lt;br /&gt;
are permitted to propose new laws. AI trained in the law are&lt;br /&gt;
available to help citizens frame sound proposals, and the web&lt;br /&gt;
is used to make the citizenry aware of proposals under consideration.&lt;br /&gt;
The level of public support for a proposed law is&lt;br /&gt;
constantly measured by web-based polling. If a proposal&lt;br /&gt;
appears to have sufficient support, it can be voted on by the&lt;br /&gt;
whole citizenry, again through the web.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With the primary responsibility for law-making shifted&lt;br /&gt;
to the citizens, the formal legislature’s role is reduced. In&lt;br /&gt;
most cyberdemocracies, the legislature has only limited&lt;br /&gt;
authority to pass laws without citizen involvement. Instead, it&lt;br /&gt;
helps review proposed laws, killing some proposals and sending&lt;br /&gt;
others back for reformulation. The citizenry can always&lt;br /&gt;
override these decisions, given enough public support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Cyberdemocratic Experiment==&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberdemocracy has only recently become feasible,&lt;br /&gt;
with the appearance of AI sophisticated enough to administer&lt;br /&gt;
elections and provide the necessary advisory support. The&lt;br /&gt;
system was first tried in Switzerland, where several canton&lt;br /&gt;
parliaments were reorganized in the late 2070s. Since then,&lt;br /&gt;
cyberdemocracy has been adopted by a number of European&lt;br /&gt;
nations. The European Parliament is itself experimenting&lt;br /&gt;
with cyberdemocracy; half the delegates are selected by lot,&lt;br /&gt;
while all receive extensive AI support.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cyberdemocracy is not without its critics. Many question&lt;br /&gt;
whether the form can be called “democratic” at all, given&lt;br /&gt;
the radical change in the way public officials are selected.&lt;br /&gt;
The fact that AI is so integral to the system at every level is&lt;br /&gt;
also a matter for concern. Some critics call cyberdemocracy&lt;br /&gt;
a thin veneer over oligarchic rule by infomorphs. Others&lt;br /&gt;
point out that the lawmaking and voting processes can be&lt;br /&gt;
subverted by manipulation of the controlling AI systems.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Europe, cyberdemocracy has generally been adopted&lt;br /&gt;
peacefully, as a natural evolution of liberal democracy. In the&lt;br /&gt;
Americas, the concept has often served as a trigger for political&lt;br /&gt;
violence. This has been particularly true in the United&lt;br /&gt;
States, where the growing “People’s Choice” movement&lt;br /&gt;
faces stiff resistance from the entrenched political class. The&lt;br /&gt;
movement’s supporters include several urban-insurgency&lt;br /&gt;
groups, which have fought small but fierce battles against&lt;br /&gt;
federal forces.&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 13:39:31 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>Ecb</dc:creator>			<comments>http://wiki.gothpoodle.com/index.php/Talk:Cyberdemocracy</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>